Vol 12 (2021): August
Private Law

The Validity of Transfer of Receivables (Cessie) from the Cessioner I Buyer to the Cessioner II Buyer in Review from the Civil Code
Keabsahan Pengalihan Piutang (Cessie) dari Pembeli Cessioner I Kepada Pembeli Cessioner II di Tinjau dari KUHPerdata


Ning Sriati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Noor Fatimah Mediawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published August 23, 2021
Keywords
  • Dispute,
  • Credit Agreement,
  • Receivable Transfer
How to Cite
Sriati, N., & Mediawati, N. F. (2021). The Validity of Transfer of Receivables (Cessie) from the Cessioner I Buyer to the Cessioner II Buyer in Review from the Civil Code. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 12, 10.21070/ijler.v12i0.727. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v12i0.727

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the validity of a transfer of receivables (cessie) and to find out whether there is legal protection against Cessioner II. This research was conducted by reviewing Article 613 of the Civil Code concerning the Transfer of Receivables and Article 1320 of the Engagement. Using the statute approach as the type of research. The conclusion of this study states that the validity of the cessie is valid because there was a previous credit agreement between Bank BTN (cedent) and the debtor involving Cessioners I and II in accordance with the contents of Articles 613 and 1320 of the Civil Code. The existence of this legitimacy makes Cessioner II as the creditor the latest to receive legal protection, in the event of a default from the debtor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Undang- Undang No 7 Tahun 1992 tentang perbankan
  2. Diccy Hertanto, Winanto Wiryomartani, Daly Erni,”Perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditur atas pelaksanaan pengalihan piutang secara cessie dan akibatnya terhadap jaminan hak tanggungan study putusan pengadilan tinggi Jawa Barat Nomor 126/PDT/2018/PT BDG” Tahun 2020, (http://scholar.google.co.id), diakses pada tanggal 1 Juli 2021
  3. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Pasal 613 Tentang Pengalihan Piutang
  4. Berutu, Therisia Monika. Tahun 2019, “Keabsahan Akte Pengalihan Piutang terhadap Tindakan Peralihan Piutnang yang Terjadi Berulang Kali tanpa Pemberithuan Kepada Debitur di tinjau dariKUHPerdata" (online) (http://scholar.google.co.id), akses tanggal 29 Juni 2021.
  5. Netty Mery, Herawati. Tahun 2020, “Pengalihan Piutang Bank Secara Cessie dan Akibatnya Terhadap Agunan yang tidak di Bebani Hak Tanggungan (Study kasus atas putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bogor Nomor 73/Pdt.g/2018PN Bgr), (online) (http://scholar.google.co.id) akses pada tanggal 29 Juni 2020.
  6. Amiruddin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.
  7. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jawa Timur Nomor Perkara 97/PDT2017/PT SBY
  8. Abdullah, M Zen.”Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Syarat Sah dan Unsur-Unsur Dalam Suatu Perjanjian”, (online) (http://scholar.google.co.id) akses pada tanggal 29 Juni 2021.
  9. Budi Cahyono, Akhmad.” Cessie Sebagai Bentuk Pengalihan Piutang Atas Nama”, (online) (http://scholar.google.co.id), akses pada tanggal 29 Juni 2021.
  10. Subekti, R.”Aneka Perjanjian’, Bandung: Alumni, 1982