Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 19 No 3 (2024): August
Private Law

Exploring the Validity of International Geographical Indications for Indonesian Products
Menjajaki Keabsahan Indikasi Geografis Internasional untuk Produk Indonesia.


View Article
  • Srivit Aviva,
  • Noor Fatimah Mediawati*
Srivit Aviva
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Noor Fatimah Mediawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i3.1206
Published August 24, 2024
Keywords
  • Geographical Indications,
  • Trademark Registration,
  • International Law,
  • Indonesia,
  • Legal Framework
How to Cite
Aviva, S., & Mediawati, N. F. (2024). Exploring the Validity of International Geographical Indications for Indonesian Products. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(3), 10.21070/ijler.v19i3.1206. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i3.1206

Copyright (c) 2024 Srivit Aviva, Noor Fatimah Mediawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abstract: The increasing globalization of markets has raised significant legal questions regarding the registration of geographical indications (GIs), particularly concerning the validity of registering names from regions outside Indonesia. This research adopts a normative research method utilizing a statute approach to explore the legal framework governing GIs in Indonesia and compare it with international standards. The knowledge gap identified in this study pertains to the lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the requirements for registering foreign geographical names as GIs in Indonesia. The aim of this research is to provide an in-depth analysis of the legal validity of such registrations, focusing on the specific requirements and implications under Indonesian law. Preliminary findings indicate that while foreign regional names can be registered as trademarks if they meet specific criteria, they cannot be registered as GIs due to the absence of unique characteristics attributable to the geographical factors of the foreign country. This study's novelty lies in its comparative perspective, highlighting the discrepancies between local and international GI regulations, thereby enriching the discourse on intellectual property rights in a global context. The implications of this research are significant for policymakers and legal practitioners, as it underscores the necessity for clearer regulations and standards governing the use of foreign geographical names, ultimately aiming to protect consumers and uphold the integrity of Indonesian GIs.

Highlights:

 

  1. oreign names may qualify for trademark registration under specific conditions.
  2. Geographical indications require unique regional characteristics for registration.
  3. Comparative analysis enhances understanding of international geographical indication laws.

 

Keywords: Geographical Indications, Trademark Registration, International Law, Indonesia, Legal Framework

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. R. Muttaqin, “Analisis Yuridis Peran Pemerintah Kabupaten Gayo dalam Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis terhadap Produk Lokal,” Thesis, Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2022. Diakses: Juli 21, 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada:https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/49552
  2. J. J. Sumanti, “Akibat Hukum Pemakaian Merek Yang Memiliki Persamaan Pada Pokoknya Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis,” LEX Priv., vol. 10, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Apr. 2022, Diakses: Juli 21, 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia Pada:https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/40371
  3. M. Ferdian, “Kedudukan Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Tidak Jujur,” J. Ilm. Huk. Dirgant., vol. 9, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Oct. 2019, doi:10.35968/jh.v9i2.355.
  4. Tomy Pasca Rifai, “Kesiapan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Terhadap Persaingan Usaha Tidak Jujur,” masters, Universitas Lampung, 2016. Diakses: Juli. 21, 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada:https://digilib.unila.ac.id/25339/
  5. F. N. Hediati, “Optimalisasi Pengawasan pada Penerimaan Pendaftaran Merek dalam Rangka Perlindungan Merek,” J. Suara Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 234–257, Sep. 2020, doi:10.26740/jsh.v2n2.p234-257.
  6. C. Irawan, “Pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hukum dan Peningkatan Daya Saig Produk Daerah di Indonesia,” Proceeding Sendiu, Aug. 2017, Diakses: 21Juli 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada:https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/sendi_u/article/view/5065
  7. P. W. Lasut, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ggugatan Atas Pelanggaran Merek Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 20116 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis,” LEX Soc., vol.7, no.1, Art. no.1, Feb. 2019, doi:10.35796/les.v7i1.22848.
  8. Dialogia Iuridica “Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dengan World Intellectual Proper," Diakses: 21 Juli 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada:http://114.7.153.31/index.php/dialogia/article/view/1972
  9. H. Faradz, “Perlindungan Hak Atas Merek,” J. Din. Huk., vol.8, no.1, Art. no.1, Jan.2008, doi:10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.1.27.
  10. WR Yessiningrum,“Perlindungan Hukum Indikasi Geografis Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual," Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan.” Diakses: 21 Juli 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada:https://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS/article/view/198
  11. D. S. Wijanarko and S. Pribadi, “Perlindungan Hukum Preventif terhadap Merek Dagang di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis,” Log. J. Penelit. Univ. Kuningan, vol. 13, no. 02, pp. 192–201, Dec. 2022, doi:10.25134/logika.v13i02.7178.
  12. Nasrianti, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Indikasi Geografis Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis," Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin.” Diakses: 21 Juli 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada:https://journal.geutheeinstitute.com/index.php/JG/article/view/157
  13. R. F. Mayana, “Perlindungan Merek Non Tradisional Untuk Produk Ekonomi Kreatif Berdasarkan Undang- Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek, Indikasi Geografis dan Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum,” J.
  14. Bina Mulia Huk., vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Sep. 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.3
  15. Wacana Paramarta, “Sengketa Merek Terdaftar di Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis,": Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,” Jul. 2020, Diakses: 21 Juli 2024. [Daring] Tersedia pada:http://paramarta.web.id/index.php/paramarta/article/view/70
  16. L. S. Muis, A. Adri, and Y. Media, “Brand Registration of Tour and Travel Services PT. Jaya Major Tour in Solok City,” Abstr. Undergrad. Res. Fac. Law Bung Hatta Univ., vol.6, no.1, Art. no.1, Feb. 2015, Diakses: 13 Agustus 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia pada:https://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php/JFH/article/view/4389
  17. M. A. Maulana, “Tinjauan Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Platform Roblox,” J. Anal. Huk., Jan. 2023, Diakses: 13 Agustus 2024. [Daring]. Tersedia
  19. pada:https://www.academia.edu/103328783/Tinjauan_Hukum_Hak_Atas_Kekayaan_Intelektual_Pada_Platfor m_Roblox
  20. M. T. Multazam, N. F. Mediawati, and S. B. Purwaningsih, “Buku Ajar Hukum Perusahaan,” Umsida Press, pp. 202–202, 2023. Diakses pada:https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.2021.8.719
  21. N. E. Safitri, M. T. Multazam, R. R. Phahlevy, and K. Z. Abduvalievich, “Virtual Objects Trading in Indonesia: Legal Issues on Ownership and Copyright,” presented at the International Conference on Intellectuals’ Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2022), Atlantis Press, May 2023, pp. 713–721. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-052-7_76.