Vol 18 No 2 (2023): May
Financial Technology

Profitability Moderates Institutional Ownership's Impact on Financial Distress
Profitabilitas Memoderasi Dampak Kepemilikan Institusional pada Financial Distress


Fristia Harum Betari
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Aisha Hanif
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published March 8, 2023
Keywords
  • Financial Distress,
  • Institutuonal Ownership,
  • Leverage,
  • Sales Growth,
  • Profitability
How to Cite
Betari, F. H., & Hanif, A. (2023). Profitability Moderates Institutional Ownership’s Impact on Financial Distress. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 18(2), 10.21070/ijler.v19i0.905. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i0.905

Abstract

This study aims to examine the impact of leverage, sales growth, institutional ownership, and profitability on financial distress in the Retail Trade Subsector Companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2017 and 2021, and to investigate the moderating effect of profitability on these relationships. The study uses quantitative analysis and secondary data from financial statements of 18 purposively sampled companies. The Smart Partial Least Square 3.2.7 program was used for statistical analysis. The results indicate that leverage has a significant impact on financial distress, while sales growth and institutional ownership do not affect financial distress. Profitability was found to moderate the relationship between institutional ownership and financial distress. The study provides important insights into factors that contribute to financial distress in this sector, highlighting the moderating role of profitability in managing financial distress. The findings may have practical implications for managers and investors in the Retail Trade Subsector Companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.

Highlights:

  1. Leverage has a significant impact on financial distress in the Retail Trade Subsector Companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
  2. Sales growth and institutional ownership do not have a direct effect on financial distress.
  3. Profitability plays a moderating role in the relationship between institutional ownership and financial distress.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. B. Sugihartono, T. E. Putri, and R. M. Nur’alim, “THE EFFECT OF LIQUIDITY , LEVERAGE , AND SALES GROWTH ON FINANCIAL DISTRESS WITH PROFITABILITY AS ( Case study of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2017 – 2019 ),” J. Account. Sustain. Soc., vol. 03, no. 01, pp. 45–69, 2021.
  2. D. R. Rani, “Pengaruh Likuiditas, Leverage, Profitabilitas, Agency Cost, dan Sales Growth terhadap Kemungkinan Terjadinya Financial distress (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2012-2015),” J. Online Mahasiwa Fak. Ekon., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3661–3675, 2017.
  3. L. C. Moleong, “Pengaruh Real Interest Rate dan Leverage Terhadap Financial Distress,” Modus, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 71–86, 2018.
  4. M. A. R. Indonesia, “PUTUSAN Nomor 1397 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017,” 2017.
  5. A. Damajanti, H. Wulandari, and Rosyati, “PENGARUH RASIO KEUANGAN TERHADAP FINANCIAL DISTRESS PADA PERUSAHAAN SEKTOR PERDAGANGAN ECERAN DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2015-2018,” J. Ilm. Bid. Ilmu Ekon., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 29–44, 2021, doi: 10.26623/slsi.v19i1.2998.
  6. Makmur, “Kepailitan PT. TOZI SENTOSA AKKIBAT PANDEMI,” J. Huk. Mimb. Justitia, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 254–266, 2022.
  7. V. K. Annisa, D. Amboningtyas, and E. G. Purwa, “PENGARUH FLOWS CASH, SALES GROWTH, LEVERAGE DAN FINANCIAL DISTRESS DENGAN PROFITABILITAS SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI (Studi Empiris Pada Food and Beverage Cakupan Register Food 2016- 2020),” J. Manage., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.
  8. Vionita and H. Lusmeida, “Analisis Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Financial Distress (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI 2014-2017),” Semin. Nas. Call Pap. Semin. Bisnis Magister Manaj., pp. 36–62, 2019.
  9. H. D. Platt and M. B. Platt, “Predicting corporate financial distress: Reflections on choice-based sample bias,” J. Econ. Financ., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 184–199, 2002, doi: 10.1007/bf02755985.
  10. H. E. Zulaecha and A. Mulvitasari, “Pengaruh Likuiditas, Leverage, Dan Sales Growth Terhadapfinancial Distress,” JMB J. Manaj. dan Bisnis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2019, doi: 10.31000/jmb.v8i1.1573.
  11. D. E. Y. Bernardin and G. Indriani, “Fiancial Distress : Leverage, Likuiditas, Aktivitas Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Dimoderasi Profitabilitas,” J. Financ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–49, 2020.
  12. I. Asfali, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Leverage, Aktivitas, Pertumbuhann Penjualan Terhadap Financial Distress Perusahaan Kimia,” JEM, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 56–66, 2019.
  13. A. J. Saputra and S. Salim, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Farm Size, dan Sales Growth Terhadap Financial Distress,” Multiparadigma Akunt. Tarumanagara, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 262–269, 2020.
  14. E. R. Prasetya and R. Oktavianna, “FINANCIAL DISTRESS DIPENGARUHI OLEH SALES,” JABI, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 170–182, 2021.
  15. Yosua and A. S. Pamungkas, “Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Financial Distress,” J. Manajerial dan Kewirausahaan, vol. I, no. 3, pp. 618–628, 2019.
  16. Y. W. Hastuti and T. Achmad, “PENGARUH MEKANISME CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SECARA INTERNAL DAN EKSTERNAL TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN : STUDI KASUS DI BANK YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI 2006-2009,” vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2016.
  17. M. Muhtar and A. Aswan, “Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Terjadinya Kondisi Financial Distress Pada Perusahaan Telekomunikasi Di Indonesia,” JBMI (Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, dan Inform., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 167–184, 2017, doi: 10.26487/jbmi.v13i3.1712.
  18. I. Munawar, A. Firli, and A. Iradianty, “Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance terhadap Financial Distress (Studi pada Perusahaan Subsektor Tekstil dan Garmen di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2012-2016),” e-Proceeding Manag., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1867–1877, 2018.
  19. K. R. Pranita and F. T. Kristanti, “Analisis Financial Distress Menggunakan Analisis Survival,” Nominal Barom. Ris. Akunt. dan Manaj., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 62–79, 2020, doi: 10.21831/nominal.v9i2.30917.
  20. R. dwi Handayani, A. Widiaswara, and N. Amah, “Pengaruh operating capacity dan sales growth terhadap financial distress dengan profitabilitas sebagai variabel moderating.,” pp. 137–151, 2019.
  21. D. Kristiana and S. Susilawati, “FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI FINANCIAL DISTRESS DENGAN DIMODERASI PROFITABILITAS,” J. Akunt., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2021.
  22. R. Wilujeng and A. Yulianto, “Determinan Financial Distress dengan Profitabilitas Sebagai Variabel Moderating,” J. Penelitan Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–102, 2020, doi: 10.33633/jpeb.v5i1.2746.
  23. N. wayan Agustini and ni gusti putu Wirawati, “Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan Pada Financial Distress Perusahaan Ritel Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI),” E-Jurnal Akunt. Univ. Udayana, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 251–280, 2019.
  24. M. Muzanni and I. Yuliana, “Comparative Analysis of Altman, Springate, and Zmijewski Models in Predicting the Bankruptcy of Retail Companies in Indonesia and Singapore,” TIJAB (The Int. J. Appl. Business), vol. 5, no. 1, p. 81, 2021, doi: 10.20473/tijab.v5.i1.2021.81-93.
  25. Y. T. Fahma and N. D. Setyaningsih, “Analisis Financial Distress Dengan Metode Altman, Zmijewski, Grover, Springate, Ohlson Dan Zavgren Untuk Memprediksi Kebangkrutan Pada Perusahaan Ritel,” J. Ilm. Bisnis dan Ekon. Asia, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 200–216, 2021, doi: 10.32815/jibeka.v15i2.398.
  26. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2016.
  27. Duryadi, Metode Penelitian Ilmiah. Semarang: Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 2021.
  28. F. M. Sutra and R. G. Mais, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Financial Distress dengan Pendekatan Altman Z-Score pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2017,” J. Akunt. dan Manaj., vol. 16, no. 01, pp. 34–72, 2019, doi: 10.36406/jam.v16i01.267.
  29. I. B. Sonza, “PATTERNS OF EFFICIENCY IN DISPERSED , DOMINANT AND CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP STRUCTURES IN BRAZIL,” vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 232–259, 2017.
  30. A. Kurniasanti and M. Musdholifah, “PENGARUH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, RASIO KEUANGAN, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN DAN MAKROEKONOMI TERHADAP FINANCIAL DISTRESS (Studi Pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2012-2016),” J. Ilmu Manaj., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 197–212, 2018.
  31. S. Sharma, R. M. Durand, and O. Gur-Arie, “Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 3, p. 291, 1981, doi: 10.2307/3150970.
  32. N. Mulyatiningsih and S. Atiningsih, “Peran Profitabilitas dalam Memoderasi Pengaruh Intellectual Capital, Leverage, dan Sales Growth terhadap Financial Distress (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Infrastruktur, Utilitas, dan Transportasi yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2014-2018),” JUARA (Jurnal Ris. Akuntansi), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 55–74, 2021.
  33. D. C. Ovami and R. H. Lubis, “Determinants of Audit Report Lag with Company Size as Moderating Variable: Evidence from Real Estate and Property Sector in Indonesian,” Saudi J. Econ. Financ., vol. 3(2), pp. 77–83, 2019, doi: 10.21276/sjef.2019.3.2.1.