Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 9 (2020): November
Private Law

Weaknesses of Fidusia Execution After Rules of the Constituonal Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019
Kelemahan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019


View Article
  • Suyanti Suyanti*,
  • Sri Budi Purwaningsih
Suyanti Suyanti
Law Study Program, Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *
Sri Budi Purwaningsih
Law Study Program, Faculty of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2020.V9.693
Published November 10, 2020
Keywords
  • Execution,
  • Fiduciary Guarantee Certificate,
  • Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019
How to Cite
Suyanti, S., & Purwaningsih, S. B. (2020). Weaknesses of Fidusia Execution After Rules of the Constituonal Court Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 9, 10.21070/ijler.2020.V9.693. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2020.V9.693

Copyright (c) 2020 Suyanti Suyanti, Sri Budi Purwaningsih

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The public's need for funding is currently increasing, which is used as additional capital, then people borrow funds from financing institutions on the condition that there is a guarantee to ensure legal certainty and if the debtor has broken his promise later, the object that is guaranteed can be executed, one form of guarantee institution, namely: fiduciary guarantee. The problem examined in this research is whether the decision of the constitutional court number 18 / PUU-XVII / 2019 weakens the implementation of the fiduciary guarantee execution and what is the weakness in the implementation of the fiduciary guarantee execution. The methodology used in this research is juridical and sociological based on field data and statutory regulations which are equipped with theory and literacy then followed by field data to answer the problems studied with a statute approach and analyzed deductively. The results of the research on the execution of the fiduciary object cannot be carried out by the creditor if there is no agreement from the debtor and if it is not interpreted about the existence of a default and the debtor is not willing to give voluntarily and the execution of the execution is not easy for the creditor to do.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. H. Salim HS, S.H., M.S. 2008. Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia, Jakarta. Hlm. 56.
  2. Jawade Hafidz Martin Anggiat Maranata Manurung, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Apabila Objek Jaminan Fidusia Ternyata Hilang Dan Debitor Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus Di PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Dinamika Bangun Arta Salatiga)’, 04.1 (2017), 37.
  3. Khifni Kafa Rufaida dan Rian Sacipto, ‘Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang Sah’, Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4.1 (2019), 23 <https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p21-40>.
  4. Fani Martiawan Kumara Putra, ‘Karakteristik Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia Pada Benda Persediaan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Saat Debitor Wanprestasi’, Perspektif, 21.1 (2016), 38 <https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v21i1.189>.
  5. Ambar Sharen Peari Carakata and Budhisulistyawati, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Pada Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia’, Jurnal Privat Law, VII.2 (2019), 296.
  6. M. Bahsan S.H., S.E. 2008. Hukum Jaminan Dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Hal 66-67.
  7. James Ridwan Efferin, ‘Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 James’, Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 12.1 (2020), 45 <https://doi.org/10.24903/yrs.v12i1.789>.
  8. Muhammad Junaid Soegianto, Diah Sulistiyani R S, ‘Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kajian Undang-Undang Excecution Of Fidusial Guarantee In Law Number 42 Of 1999 Concerning Fidusian Guarantee’, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4.Nomor 2 (2019), 213.
  9. Undang-undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia
  10. Agustina, ‘Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Fidusia Pada FIF Astra Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia’, Jurnal Pro Hukum, IV.1 (2015), 51.
  11. Risfa Sadiqah, R Suharto, and Herni Widanarti, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Dan Biaya Pembuatan Akta Jaminan Fidusia’, Jurnal Hukum Diponegoro, 6.1 (2017), 13.
  12. Benny Krestian Heriawanto, ‘Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial’, Legality, 27.1 (2019), 54.
  13. Amiruddin, dkk. 2016. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Hal 164.
  14. Wawancara dengan bapak Yetfa Hendra Bawuna, Kepala Kredit PT. Federal Internasional Finance, Bojonegoro, 28 Mei 2020.
  15. Wawancara dengan bapak Yusuf Sofian, Kepala Cabang PT. Federal Internasional Finance, Bojonegoro, 28 Mei 2020.
  16. Ni Putu Theresa Putri Nusantara, ‘Eksekusi Dan Pendaftaran Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia’, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, 2.2 (2018), 8–9.
  17. DR. Muhammad Syaifuddin, S.H., M.Hum. 2012.Hukum Kontrak Memahami Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, Dan Pratik Hukum (Seri Pengayaan Hukum Perikatan).Bandung.Mandar maju, Hal.338.