Login
Section Private Law

Legal Status of Renovated Inherited Property in Divorce

Status Hukum Properti Warisan yang Direnovasi dalam Perceraian
Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025): May:

Sherly Mauludia Safitri (1), Sri Budi Purwaningsih (2)

(1) Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

Background: Divorce in Indonesia often leaves disputes over property division, particularly regarding the distinction between joint property and inherited or premarital assets. Specific Background: A recurring issue is whether personal assets renovated during marriage can be considered joint property, given unclear regulations and limited case law guidance. Knowledge Gap: Current laws, including Law No. 1 of 1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law, do not explicitly address the status of renovated inherited property, leaving courts to rely on principles of contribution and fairness. Aim: This study examines how renovated personal assets are treated in divorce cases at the Sidoarjo Religious Court and provides recommendations for legal clarity. Method: Using a normative juridical approach with statutory and case study analysis, data was collected from legislation, court decisions, and legal literature. Results: Renovations to personal property can be classified as joint property if supported by significant financial or non-financial contributions from both spouses; otherwise, they remain personal property. Evidence and proof of contribution are critical in court decisions. Novelty & Implications: The study highlights the need for clearer regulations and public awareness to prevent disputes, ensure fair asset distribution, and protect the rights of both spouses and children in divorce proceedings.









Highlights:




  • Renovated inherited assets may become joint property with documented spousal contribution.




  • Evidence of financial and non-financial contributions is crucial in court recognition.




  • Clearer regulations are needed to reduce disputes and ensure fairness.




Keywords: Joint Property; Inherited Property; Divorce; Asset Renovation; Legal Contribution








Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] N. E. Tisnawati and S. B. Purwaningsih, “Legal Protection Against Substitute Heirs Based on Islamic Law,” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 4, 2021, doi: 10.21070/ijis.v4i0.1578.

[2] P. H. Limbong, S. A. Siregar, and M. Yasid, “Pengaturan Hukum Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Perdata Yang Berlaku Saat Ini Di Indonesia,” Retentum, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 177–190, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.46930/retentum.v5i2.1346.

[3] N. F. Mediawati, E. W. Maryam, S. B. Purwaningsih, R. R. Azizah, and M. O. Cassey, “Bekwaamheid Effect in the Distribution of Divorce Cases in Indonesia: A Lesson from Sidoarjo,” Rechtsidee, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 45–56, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.21070/jihr.2020.6.694.

[4] A. R. Amin, “Pembagian Harta Bersama,” Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama, Jul. 29, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/pembagian-harta-bersama-oleh-ang-rijal-amin-s-h-29-7

[5] M. T. Pradoto, Aspek Yuridis Pembagian Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan: Tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2021.

[6] F. Wahyudi, “Interpretasi Pasal 97 KHI Tentang Pembagian Harta Bersama Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah,” Jurnal Hukum Islam, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2021.

[7] I. Banaesa, Perkembangan Perceraian di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Laksbang Press, 2020.

[8] N. Januari, “Menggali Akar Masalah: Analisis Kasus Perceraian di Indonesia,” Jurnal Mahasiswa Hukum, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 120–130, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.37481/jmh.v3i3.613.

[9] Hukum Islam, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–102, Jun. 2021.

[10] A. Aprindawati and M. Y. Selma, “Analisis Pembagian Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian Dalam Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Pengadilan Agama Pangkalan Balai,” Jurnal Al-Muzara’ah, vol. 8, pp. 45–59, 2023.

[11] S. P., “Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Menurut Aturan Hukum,” SIP Law Firm, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://siplawfirm.id/harta-gono-gini/?lang=id

[12] P. H. Limbong, S. A. Siregar, and M. Yasid, “Pengaturan Hukum Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Perdata Yang Berlaku Saat Ini Di Indonesia,” Retentum, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 177–190, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.46930/retentum.v5i2.1346.

[13] A. I. Safitri, Z. Mariastutik, and M. Andri, “Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam,” Justicia Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–23, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.32492/jj.v11i1.11102.

[14] L. Faizal, Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2021.

[15] H. H. Puspytasari, “Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif,” Jurnal Hukum Islam, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 201–218, 2022.

[16] Z. Muttaqin and S. U. Usqak, “Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembagian Kasus Harta Gono Gini Akibat Perceraian Pasangan Suami Istri di Pengadilan Agama Mataram,” CIVICUS, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 127–138, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.31764/civicus.v8i2.2947.

[17] C. Kesaulya and D. A. Pratiwi, “Pengelolaan Harta Kekayaan Dalam Perkawinan Akibat Perceraian,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, vol. 8, pp. 101–115, 2024.

[18] Putusan 3925 Pdt.G 2023 PA Sda, 2023. [Online]. Available: local court archive.

[19] Putusan 44 Pdt.G 2024 PA Sda, 2024. [Online]. Available: local court archive.

[20] Putusan 1494 Pdt.G 2024 PA Sda, 2024. [Online]. Available: local court archive.

[21] Putusan 4168 Pdt.G 2021 PA Sda, 2021. [Online]. Available: local court archive.

[22] S. Hariati and M. Salat, “Ketidakadilan Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Pada Kasus Perceraian,” Jurnal Hukum & Peradilan, 2013.

[23] E. A. Putri and W. S. Wahyuni, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian Dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia,” Mercatoria, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 40–52, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.31289/mercatoria.v14i2.5692.