Firdaus Enov At Taufany (1), Sri Budi Purwaningsih (2)
Background: Open trip mountain services organized by communities are increasingly popular but prone to breaches of contract, causing losses to climbers. Specific Background: Cases such as forced descent at Pos 2 Sembalun Lawang, Gunung Rinjani, highlight the lack of clarity regarding compensation rights in community-managed trips. Knowledge Gap: Existing literature rarely addresses the intersection of civil law principles and economic transaction theories in regulating compensation for open trip services. Aim: This study analyzes legal obligations and compensation mechanisms for climbers affected by breaches of contract using civil law perspectives and supply-and-demand theory. Methods: Normative legal research with statutory and economic theory approaches, supplemented by secondary sources, analyzed descriptively. Results: Participants are entitled to compensation when services fail to meet agreed standards. Theories of offer, acceptance, and trust clarify when agreements are legally binding and how liability arises. Dispute resolution can occur through mediation, arbitration, or court litigation, with distinct procedural considerations. Novelty: Integrating legal theory with economic principles provides a clearer framework for determining compensation and managing expectations in open trip services. Implications: Understanding these frameworks enhances legal certainty and protects climbers’ rights in community-organized outdoor tourism.
Highlights:
Legal responsibility arises upon confirmation of trip participation.
Theories of offer, acceptance, and trust guide compensation claims.
Multi-path dispute resolution supports fair and efficient outcomes.
Keywords: Compensation, Breach of Contract, Open Trip, Civil Law, Community Tourism
[1] A. Viqi, “Viral 103 Pendaki di Gunung Rinjani Dipaksa Turun Gegara Ditipu Open Trip,” DetikNews, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7295433/viral-103-pendaki-di-gunung-rinjani-dipaksa-turun-gegara-ditipu-open-trip
[2] R. Ayundhani, “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Pemegang Polis Asuransi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Klaim Asuransi (Studi Kasus PT Asuransi Astra Buana),” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 4722–4736, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i7.12844.
[3] I. M. Angela, A. Suryamah, and D. Yuanitasari, “Doktrin Res Ipsa Loquitur Pada Perlindungan Konsumen,” Widya Yuridika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 209–209, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.31328/wy.v7i1.4778.
[4] M. R. Hakim, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Sebagai Penumpang Yang Mengalami Kerugian Materiil Dan Immateriil Dikarenakan Maskapai Yang Membatalkan Jadwal Penerbangan,” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 178–189, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i1.14784.
[5] M. R. Adinata and R. A. Hapsari, “Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Masyarakat Yang Melakukan Fintech Peer-To-Peer Lending Atau Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Dalam Sebuah Aplikasi Pinjaman Online (Julo) (Studi Penelitian: Otoritas Jasa),” Case Law, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21–38, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.25157/caselaw.v3i1.2691.
[6] E. Erlyna and M. Isnawati, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Transaksi Jual Beli Pada Marketplace,” Perspektif Hukum, pp. 26–44, May 2024, doi: 10.30649/ph.v24i1.263.
[7] M. I. Nafian, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Elektronik,” Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 901–915, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.36418/syntax-imperatif.v4i6.333.
[8] L. P. L. Prayogo, “Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pelaku Usaha Atas Penipuan Melalui Iklan Penjualan Barang Yang Tidak Sesuai Dengan Yang Diperjanjikan,” JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin, vol. 2, no. 1, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.59945/jpnm.v2i1.140.
[9] W. Pratama and J. N. Sally, “Perlindungan Hukum Layanan Grab Food Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen,” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 2856–2861, May 2024, doi: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i4.15134.
[10] A. A. Darmawan, Y. Sumiyati, and M. I. Abidin, “Hubungan Hukum Antara Pelaku Usaha Dengan Konsumen Di Media Sosial Dan Perlindungan Hukumnya Berdasarkan UU ITE Dan UUPK,” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 546–551, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9976.
[11] F. Ahaddin, H. Qomarudin, and L. Dharmasetya, “Tindak Pidana Dalam Pengedaran Produk Kosmetik Ilegal: Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia,” Postulat, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–28, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.37010/postulat.v2i1.1458.
[12] T. Y. Rahmanto, “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Berbasis Transaksi Elektronik,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31–52, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.31-52.
[13] W. S. Putri, “Keabsahan Kontrak Elektronik Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perikatan,” Jurnal Analisis Hukum, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 300–309, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.38043/jah.v1i2.417.
[14] A. D. Cahyadi, “Yurisdiksi Transaksi Elektronik Internasional Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik,” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–40, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.25072/jwy.v3i1.203.
[15] M. T. Multazam, N. F. Mediawati, and S. B. Purwaningsih, Buku Ajar Hukum Perusahaan, 202nd ed., Umsida Press, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21070/978-623-464-061-8
[16] N. Aulia and S. R. Suminar, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Akibat Penggunaan Kertas Bekas Bertinta Sebagai Pembungkus Makanan Berminyak Ditinjau Dari UUPK Jo. UU Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pangan Jo. Peraturan BPOM Nomor 20 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kemasan Pangan,” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 552–559, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9977.
[17] G. L. Dewi and A. H. Zakiran, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Terhadap Produk Pemutih Badan Yang Tidak Memiliki Izin Edar Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen,” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 581–588, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9998.
[18] D. Hendryan, L. Ganiarta, and G. Aryani, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online (E-Commerce),” Viva Themis Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 83–96, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.24967/vt.v6i1.2766.
[19] M. A. Maulana and M. T. Multazam, “Virtual Land: Deciphering Blockchain-Based Property Transactions And Their Legal Implications,” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 81–99, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.25072/jwy.v7i1.574.
[20] R. M. Alfin and R. E. Latumahina, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Agen Travel Atas Kegagalan Keberangkatan Haji Dan Umrah,” SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 152–157, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.55681/seikat.v3i2.1270.
[21] N. F. Mediawati and S. B. Purwaningsih, Buku Ajar Hukum Kontrak Dan Perikatan, Umsida Press, pp. 1–104, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.21070/2018/978-602-5914-35-5.