Vol 16 (2022): August
Labor Law

The Role of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in Improving Workforce Performance and Corporate Culture
Peranan Good Coorporate Governance (GCG) Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Tenaga Kerja Dan Budaya Perusahaan


Affandy Winarko Mudjib
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Wisnu Panggah Setiyono
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published August 31, 2022
Keywords
  • Good Corporate Covernance (GCG),
  • Labor Performance,
  • Corporate Culture,
  • Company Reputation
How to Cite
Mudjib, A. W., & Setiyono, W. P. (2022). The Role of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in Improving Workforce Performance and Corporate Culture. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 16, 10.21070/ijler.v16i0.812. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v16i0.812

Abstract

In service companies, the performance of human resources is one of the benchmarks for calculating company productivity. Anticipating that a crisis like 1997 would not return, the Indonesian government requires companies under the status of the Ministry of State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) to implement GCG. Character building of the workforce is the duty of the company in shaping the work pattern of the company's workforce, one of which is the goal of establishing the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) program. These things are currently the responsibility of PT Pegadaian (Persero). For this reason, this study aims to determine the effect of the Good Corporate Governance (GCG) system that has been set on the performance of the workforce and the condition of Corporate Culture at PT Pegadaian Surabaya Regional Office. And know the reputation of PT Pegadaian (Persero) in the eyes of the public since the implementation of the Good Corporate Covernance (GCG) system? Based on several theories and previous research that discusses Good Corporate Covernance (GCG); Labor Performance; Corporate Culture; Company Reputation. The method used is a qualitative method by processing data using Actor Network Theory. In conclusion, the Good Corporate Covernance (GCG) system that has been implemented has an influence on the performance of the workforce and the condition of the Corporate Culture at PT Pegadaian Surabaya Regional Office. Meanwhile, the reputation of PT Pegadaian (Persero) in the eyes of the public since the implementation of the Good Corporate Covernance (GCG) system has increased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Adisasmita, Rahardjo. 2010. Pengelolaan Pendapatan Dan Anggran Daerah. Graha Ilmu: Yogjakarta.
  2. A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara ,2000, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung. PT, Remaja Rosdakarya.
  3. Sedarmayanti.2009. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju.
  4. Greenberg dan Baron. 2000. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: prentice.
  5. Sunarto, 2005. MSDM Strategik. Yogyakarta: Amus
  6. Kiruja EK, Elegwa Mukuru. 2013. Effect of Motivation on Employee Performance in Public Middle
  7. Creswell, J. W. 2010. Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogyakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar.
  8. A.A Intan Puspita Sari, I.G.A.M. Asri Dwija Putri. 2015. Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance pada Manajemen Laba. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 8.1 ISSN: 2302-8556.
  9. Ambar T. Sulistiyani dan Rosidah. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Pertama. Penerbit Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta
  10. Andayani, Nur Rahmah. 2016. Pengaruh Pelatihan Kerja dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bagian PT.PCI Elektronik International Studi pada Karyawan PT PCI Elektronik International. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Vol. 4 No.1. Politeknik Negeri Batam.
  11. Andypratama, Lukas William., Mustamu, Ronny H. 2013. Penerapan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance Pada Perusahaan Keluarga: Studi Deskriptif Pada Distributor Makanan. Jurnal Agora. Vol.1
  12. Basri¸ A. F. M., dan Rivai¸ V. 2005. Performance appraisal. Jakarta: PT Raja. Grafindo Persada.
  13. Bayu, Waspodo. 2009. Kerangka Kerja Pengukuran Kinerja Berdasarkan Balance Scorecard Untuk Departemen Sistem Informasi. Universitas Islam Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta: Jurnal Komunikasi Massa. Vol 5. No.1
  14. Beer, Keenoy and Spector, Anthony, 2004. Human Resource Management and Development. London: Sage.
  15. Danim, Sudarwan. 1996. Transformasi Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  16. Douglas B. Currivan. 2000. The Causal Order Of Job Satisfaction And Organizational Commitment In Models Of employee Turnover”, University of Massachussets, Boston, MA, USA
  17. Guest, D. 1987. Human Resource Management And Industrial Relations. Journal Of Management Studies, 24: 503-21.
  18. Hall, Mark L.Lengnick dan Cynthia A. 2003. Human Resource Management in the Knowledge Economy.
  19. Hasibuan, M.. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  20. Hasibuan, M.. 2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi 13. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  21. Herbig, Paul, John Milewicz and Jim Golden. 1994. A Model of Reputation Building and Destruction. Journal of Business Research, Volume 31
  22. Hery. 2010. Cetakan Kesatu. Potret Profesi Audit Internal. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Hery. 2010. Potret Profesi Audit Internal. Bandung :Alfabeta.
  24. Kartadinata, Sunaryo. 1997. Landasan pendidikan sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
  25. Kreitner, Robert dan Angelo Kinicki. 2005. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  26. Kurniawan, Ardeno. 2012. Audit nilai tambah bagi organisasi – edisi pertama. Yogyakarta: BPFE
  27. Mathis, R.L. & J.H. Jackson. 2006. Human Resource Management: Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Terjemahan Dian Angelia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  28. Matindas. R. 1997. Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
  29. Mulyadi. 2007. Sistem Perencanaan dan Pengendalian Manajemen. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  30. Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 1997. Budaya Organisasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  31. Ranupandojo, Heidjrachman dan Suad Husnan. 2000. Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: BPFE
  32. Reksohadiprodjo, Sukanto dan Handoko, T. Hani, 2002, Organisasi Perusahaan Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  33. Robbins, P. Stephen. (2003). Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Sembilan, Jilid 2. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia
  34. Roland O. Layandi dan Dhyah Harjanti. 2014. Proses Penerapan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance Pada Perusahaan Keluarga PT. X. Jurnal Agora Vol. 2, No. 1
  35. Sinha, Sharma, & Mahendra. (2001). Development of a scale for assessing academic stress: a preliminary report. Journal of the Institute of Medicine.
  36. Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  37. Tadjuddin Noer Effendi. 1995. Sumber Daya Manusia Peluang Kerja dan Kemiskinan. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya.