Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 2 No 1 (2018): November
Corporate Law

Corporate Crime Liability towards Environmental Law in Indonesia
Pertanggungjawaban Kejahatan Korporasi terhadap Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia


View Article
  • Emi Puasa Handayani*,
  • Mochammad Wachid Hasyim
Emi Puasa Handayani
Universitas Islam Kediri, Indonesia *
Mochammad Wachid Hasyim
Universitas Islam Kediri, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2018.V2.686
Published November 1, 2018
Keywords
  • Responsibility,
  • Crime,
  • Corporations
How to Cite
Handayani, E. P., & Hasyim, M. W. (2018). Corporate Crime Liability towards Environmental Law in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 2(1), 10.21070/ijler.2018.V2.686. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2018.V2.686

Copyright (c) 2018 Emi Puasa Handayani, Mochammad Wachid Hasyim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management in addition to regulating environmental protection and management, also contains criminal provisions that can be imposed on corporation. Law regulates the existence of two types of legal subjects that can be subject to criminal sanctions, one of which are including companies or corporations as rechtpersoon. This study aims to determine the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Criminal Acts by Corporations against cases of corporate crime, especially those relating to criminal acts in the environmental field. The type of research that will be conduct are normative legal research with the method of legislation approach and conceptual approach. Based on the research, the criminal responsibility doctrine used in the Law is corporate vicarious liability, individual vicarious liability and personal accountability of the perpetrator, while Supreme Court Regulation tends to Individual Vicarious Liability doctrine.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Undang-Undang No. 32 Tahun, Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan. Lingkungan Hidup.
  2. R. Manthovani, “Terbit PERMA Tantangan Penegak Hukum dalam Menjerat Korporasi,” Hukum Online, Modifikasi Terakhir. 2017.
  3. A. G. Wibisana, “Kejahatan Lingkungan Oleh Korporasi: Mencari Bentuk Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dan Pemimpin/Pengurus Korporasi Untuk Kejahatan Lingkungan di Indonesia,” J. Huk. Pembang., vol. 46, no. 2, p. 150.
  4. BNBP, “Indonesia Darurat Asap, Gema BNBP: Ketangguhan Bangsa Dalam Menghadapi Bencana,” Gema BNPB, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4–22, 2015.
  5. D. Prabowo, “Hakim PN Palembang Pemutus Kasus Kebakaran Hutan Dilaporkan ke KY,” Kompas Online, Januari, vol. 8, 2016.
  6. “Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Tindak Pidana oleh Korporasi"
  7. S. Soekanto and S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.
  8. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
  9. T. Rahmadi, Hukum Lingkungan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.
  10. M. Priyatna, “Penerapan Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Bagi Korporasi dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia,” J. Law Rev., vol. 2.
  11. E. Mewengkang, “Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Terhadap Pencemaran Lingkungan,” J. Lex Crim., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 56, 2014.
  12. “‘Prinsip Penting dalam Penanganan Kejahatan Korporasi,’” 2017.