Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 19 No 4 (2024): November
Private Law

Legal Uncertainty in Fasum Land Disputes in Sampang Regency
Ketidakpastian Hukum dalam Sengketa Tanah Fasum di Kabupaten Sampang


Article View
  • Muhamad Assyadillah*,
  • Zhilda Khilmatus
Muhamad Assyadillah
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia *
Zhilda Khilmatus
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1271
Published November 29, 2024
Keywords
  • Land Dispute,
  • Public Facility Land,
  • Legal Uncertainty,
  • Judicial Inconsistency,
  • Land Governance
How to Cite
Assyadillah, M., & Khilmatus , Z. (2024). Legal Uncertainty in Fasum Land Disputes in Sampang Regency. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(4), 10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1271. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1271

Copyright (c) 2024 Muhamad Assyadillah, Zhilda Khilmatus

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

General Background: Land disputes over public facility (fasum) areas frequently arise due to conflicting claims, impacting legal and social stability. Specific Background: In Sampang District, a dispute emerged over fasum land in the "Puri Matahari" housing area, where a private individual constructed commercial buildings, conflicting with local regulations. Knowledge Gap: Inconsistencies in legal decisions and administrative weaknesses contribute to uncertainty in public land management. Aims: This study examines the legal status of the disputed land, judicial inconsistencies, and regulatory challenges while proposing governance improvements. Results: The findings confirm that the land legally belongs to the public domain, though administrative flaws led to legal disputes. Conflicting court rulings highlight the complexities of enforcing land use regulations. Novelty: This study identifies gaps in regulatory enforcement and judicial interpretation, proposing reforms to prevent similar conflicts. Implications: Strengthening legal frameworks, land administration, and judicial consistency is crucial to safeguarding public land and preventing future disputes.

Highlights:

  • Legal Ambiguity: Conflicting court rulings reveal gaps in public land regulations and enforcement.
  • Administrative Weakness: Poor documentation and oversight contribute to disputes over public land use.
  • Policy Reform Needed: Strengthening legal frameworks and governance can prevent future conflicts.

Keywords: Land Dispute, Public Facility Land, Legal Uncertainty, Judicial Inconsistency, Land Governance

Article View

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Z. Yahya, "Kajian Yuridis Tentang Sengketa Tanah Yang Diperuntukkan Bagi Fasilitas Pemerintah Menurut UU No. 2 Tahun 2012," Lex Crim, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 155–162, 2016.
  2. R. R. Pahlevi, Z. D. Zaini, and R. A. Hapsari, "Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah," Pagaruyuang Law Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31869/plj.v5i1.2826
  3. Ministry of Home Affairs, Republic of Indonesia, "Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengelolaan Tanah Fasilitas Umum," 2016.
  4. Government of Sampang, "Perubahan Atas Peraturan Bupati Nomor 36 Tahun 2022 Tentang Penyediaan dan Penyerahan Prasarana, Sarana, dan Utilitas Perumahan Kepada Pemerintah Daerah," 2023.
  5. Government of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2004.
  6. Government of Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 295–316, 1997.
  7. Ministry of Home Affairs, Republic of Indonesia, "Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengelolaan Aset Desa," vol. 66, pp. 37–39, 2016.
  8. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Revised Edition. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.
  9. R. Subekti and R. Tjitrosudibio, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata) 1838, 1st ed. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2019.
  10. Government of Indonesia, "Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 40 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Guna Usaha, Hak Guna Bangunan, dan Hak Pakai Atas Tanah," 1996.
  11. I. C. Nur, J. Jayus, and L. F. Nurul, "PUSKAPSI Law Review," PUSKAPSI FH UNEJ, May 2021.
  12. R. A. S. Siregar, "Analisis Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa," Islamic Circle, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2021, doi: 10.56874/islamiccircle.v2i1.472.
  13. Government of Sampang, "Sekda Ass. PKR," 2023.
  14. J. Mario and A. Y. Sulistyawan, "Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum," Journal of Crepido, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2029, doi: 10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.324.
  15. R. R. Nugraha, S. Hamidah, and M. Fadli, "Makna Kepatutan dan Kewajaran Berkaitan dengan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan dalam Undang–Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas," Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 176, 2018, doi: 10.17977/um019v3i2p176-185.
  16. Government of Sampang, "Peraturan Bupati Sampang Nomor 24 Tahun 2017," 2017.
  17. P. M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia (Introduction to the Indonesian Administrative Law). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1998.
  18. S. Solechan, "Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Pelayanan Publik," Administrative Law and Governance Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 541–557, 2019, doi: 10.14710/alj.v2i3.541-557.
  19. Y. Munaf, Hukum Administrasi Negara. Pekanbaru: Marpoyan Tujuh, 2016.