Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 19 No 3 (2024): August
Recent Cases

Unveiling Indonesia's Precautionary Principle for Trust in Digital Transactions
Mengungkap Prinsip Kehati-hatian Indonesia untuk Kepercayaan dalam Transaksi Digital


View Article
  • Shilla Hasmara Santosa,
  • Sri Budi Purwaningsih*
Shilla Hasmara Santosa
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Sri Budi Purwaningsih
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i3.1202
Published August 24, 2024
Keywords
  • Sejuta Cita,
  • ITE Law,
  • user verification,
  • precautionary principle,
  • electronic transactions
How to Cite
Santosa, S. H., & Purwaningsih, S. B. (2024). Unveiling Indonesia’s Precautionary Principle for Trust in Digital Transactions. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(3), 10.21070/ijler.v19i3.1202. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i3.1202

Copyright (c) 2024 Shilla Hasmara Santosa, Sri Budi Purwaningsih

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abstract: This research explores the compliance of the Sejuta Cita platform with Indonesia's Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), specifically focusing on Article 28, which addresses misleading information in electronic transactions. The general background underscores the growing importance of digital platforms in event management, necessitating stringent adherence to legal standards. The specific background highlights the critical role of user verification processes in ensuring accurate information and responsible user behavior. Despite the increasing reliance on these platforms, a knowledge gap remains regarding the effective implementation of the precautionary principle within their operational frameworks. The primary aim of this study is to assess whether Sejuta Cita effectively incorporates the precautionary principle into its user verification processes, employing a normative juridical method with a statute approach that analyzes key legal frameworks, including Law No. 19 of 2016 and Law No. 11 of 2008. The results reveal that the platform’s terms of use mandate compliance with ethical norms and legal regulations, thereby emphasizing responsible decision-making during event registrations. The findings also indicate potential violations related to event content, yet confirm that Sejuta Cita's terms require event creators to adhere to applicable regulations. The novelty of this study lies in its detailed examination of the platform's user verification policies and their alignment with the ITE Law. The implications suggest that adherence to the precautionary principle enhances user trust and mitigates legal risks, contributing to the establishment of safer electronic transaction environments in Indonesia.

Highlights:

 

  1. Compliance Assessment: Evaluates adherence to ITE Law on misleading information.
  2. User Verification: Analyzes precautionary principle implementation in user processes.
  3. Legal Framework: Assesses electronic agreements' implications for event organizers.

 

Keywords: Sejuta Cita, ITE Law, user verification, precautionary principle, electronic transactions

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. S. Andika, “Syarat Dan Ketentuan,” Sejuta Cita, Jakarta Selatan, 2023. [Online]. Available: Https://Sejutacita.Id/Syarat
  2. R. G. Dwitya, “Klausula Eksonerasi Dalam Akad Pembiayaan Konstruksi Btn Ib Antara Pt. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk Cabang Syariah Bandung Dengan Pt. Woodlands Propertindo Group Dihubungkan Dengan Kuhperdata Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Jun. 19, 2017. [Online]. Available: Https://Lens.Org/003-344-216-070-365
  3. Neneng Zubaidah, “Beasiswa Sejutacita X Deall Jobs 2023 Dibuka, Ada Bantuan Rp10 Juta Per Semester,” Sindonews.Com, Jakarta, 2022. [Online]. Available: Https://Edukasi.Sindonews.Com/Read/979685/213/Beasiswa-Sejutacita-X-Deall-Jobs-2023-Dibuka-Ada-Bantuan-Rp10-Juta-Per-Semester-1672049564?Showpage=All
  4. A. Widiastuti, “Apakah Aplikasi Sejuta Cita Penipuan?,” Breaking News, Bengkulu, Nov. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: Https://Www.Realitabengkulu.Co.Id/Aplikasi-Sejutacita/
  5. W. Nugroho, “Mengenali Modus Penipuan Berkedok Beasiswa,” Kompas.Com, Jakarta, Jul. 28, 2011. [Online]. Available: Https://Edukasi.Kompas.Com/Read/2011/07/28/09435680/~Edukasi~Beasiswa?Page=All
  6. A. Mashudi, “Kontrak Baku Dalam Perjanjian Leasing.” Sep. 27, 2002. [Online]. Available: Https://Lens.Org/051-804-524-722-922
  7. D. F. Rahmawati, “Analisis Terhadap Klausula Baku Berdasarkan Asas Keseimbangan Dalam Perjanjian Gadai Emas Di Pegadaian(Studi Di Pt. Pegadaian Unit Pelayanan Cabang Sengkaling).” Apr. 01, 2019. [Online]. Available: Https://Lens.Org/087-486-750-616-090
  8. Null A. P. Susanty, Null D. Rachmat, And Null Suhendro, “Pencatuman Klausula Baku Dalam Perjanjian Online Pada Media Sosial Berdasarkan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak,” Jotika Res. Bus. Law, Vol. 1, No. 2, Pp. 68–81, Jul. 2022, Doi: 10.56445/Jrbl.V1i2.46.
  9. N. Amalia, “Analisis Yuridis Pencantuman Klausula Baku Terkait Pelaku Usaha Yang Mengurangi Manfaat Jasa Pada Syarat Dan Ketentuan Ralali,” Novum J. Huk., Pp. 158–166, Jul. 2023, Doi: 10.2674/Novum.V0i0.53767.
  10. D. V. Utami And A. M. T. Anggraini, “Analisis Pencantuman Klausula Baku Dalam Perjanjian Sj Travel Pass Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen,” J. Huk. Adigama, Vol. 2, No. 2, Art. No. 2, Dec. 2019, Doi: 10.24912/Adigama.V2i2.6683.
  11. R. A. Huzairin And M. T. Multazam, “Google’s Legal Responsibility In Displaying Phishing Ads Through Google Adwords: Tanggung Jawab Hukum Google Dalam Penayangan Iklan Phishing Melalui Google Adwords.” Umsida Preprints Server, Jul. 07, 2023. Doi: 10.21070/Ups.1548.
  12. M. I. Maulana, “Klausula Baku Pada Transaksi Barang Melalui E-Commerce (Studi Kasus Transaksi Melalui Bukalapak, Tokopedia, Blanja.Com).” Jul. 14, 2020. [Online]. Available: Https://Lens.Org/183-331-922-172-312
  13. S. Purnomo, A. P. A. Santoso, M. Habib, And N. I. Fawzi’ah, “Klausula Baku Dalam Perspektif Perjanjian Dagang,” Jisip J. Ilmu Sos. Dan Pendidik., Vol. 5, No. 4, Nov. 2021, Doi: 10.58258/Jisip.V5i4.2422.
  14. A. Andrian, “Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Praktekperjanjian Pembiayaan Pada Lembaga Pembiayaankonsumen Di Kota Semarang.” 2003. [Online]. Available: Https://Lens.Org/102-170-173-277-279
  15. A. Novitarani, Null Suradi, And R. Njatrijani, “Analisis Garansi Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Jual Beli ℡Epon Seluler,” Diponegoro Law J., Vol. 5, No. 3, Pp. 1–17, Jun. 2016.
  16. Lailia Syifaatur Rosida, “Klausula Eksonerasi Dalam Perjanjian Pelayanan Penerbangan Bedasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” May 29, 2020. [Online]. Available: Https://Lens.Org/172-251-281-534-694
  17. A. P. Lestari And S. L. Utomo, “Kepastian Perlindungan Hukum Pada Klausula Baku Dalam Perjanjian Pinjaman Online Di Indonesia,” SUPREMASI J. Huk., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77–93, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.36441/supremasi.v3i1.124.