Vol 19 No 4 (2024): November
Production Management

Risk Management in Production using Quality Risk Approach and FMEA
Manajemen Risiko dalam Produksi menggunakan Pendekatan Risiko Kualitas dan FMEA


Nanda Rochimatus Solikha
Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Inggit Marodiyah
Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Published October 3, 2024
Keywords
  • Risk Management,
  • Production Process,
  • QRM,
  • FMECA,
  • AQUA
How to Cite
Solikha, N. R., & Marodiyah, I. (2024). Risk Management in Production using Quality Risk Approach and FMEA. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(4), 10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1169. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1169

Abstract

Abstract: The production process of 600ml AQUA at PT Tirta Investama (AQUA) Pandaan faces significant risks, including non-compliance with standards in bottle density, incorrect packaging labels, unreadable bottle codes, box failures, and barcode rework. These issues pose challenges in maintaining product quality and operational efficiency. Specific Background: With 247 bottles failing density standards and 18 packaging errors occurring daily, effective risk management is crucial. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies have not integrated Quality Risk Management (QRM) and Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) to address production risks in the context of AQUA's operations. Aims: This study aims to identify the highest critical risk points and propose mitigation strategies. Results: Utilizing QRM and FMECA, 42 risks were identified, categorized into 20 acceptable, 21 tolerable, and 1 unacceptable risk, specifically related to pallets stuck on conveyors due to substandard quality. Novelty: The application of these integrated methodologies provides a systematic approach to identifying and mitigating risks in the production process, highlighting the necessity for in-depth inspections by logistics and machine operators. Implications: The findings underscore the importance of rigorous quality control and proactive risk management in manufacturing to enhance product quality and minimize operational disruptions, thus ensuring customer satisfaction and competitiveness in the market.

Highlights:

  • Effective risk management is crucial to ensure product quality and operational efficiency.
  • Integration of QRM and FMECA identifies critical risk points in the production process.
  • Regular inspections and quality control can significantly reduce unacceptable risks.

Keywords: Risk Management, Production Process, QRM, FMECA, AQUA

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. D. A. Walujo, T. Koesdijanti, and Y. Utomo, Pengendalian Kualitas. Surabaya: Scopindo Media Pustaka, 2020.
  2. T. Novianti, Manajemen Risiko. Malang: Media Nusa Creative, 2017.
  3. I. Marodiyah, A. S. Cahyana, and I. R. Nurmalasari, “Integrasi Metode QRM dan FMEA Dalam Manajemen Risiko Petani Tebu,” J. Produkt., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2022.
  4. W. U. Maulidah and H. C. Wahyuni, “Food Safety and Halal Risk Mitigation in Fish Crackers Supply Chain with FMECA and AHP,” Procedia Eng. Life Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.21070/pels.v1i1.844.
  5. H. C. Wahyuni and W. Sulistyowati, Pengendalian Kualitas Industri Manufaktur dan Jasa. Sidoarjo: UMSIDA Press, 2020.
  6. F. R. P. Nasution and I. N. Nasution, “Identifikasi Risiko Kegagalan Proses Produksi Toilet Soap Plant (Sabun Mandi Padat) di PT. XYZ Dengan Menggunakan Metode Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA),” J. Manaj. Rekayasa Dan Inov. Bisnis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2023.
  7. S. R. Hadiwiyanti and E. Yuliawati, “Penentuan Penyebab Cacat Kritis Produk dengan Menggunakan FMECA,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Ind. Berkelanjutan II, vol. 2, pp. 26–34, 2022.
  8. L. Wali et al., “Analisis Manajemen Risiko pada PT. Nusa Indah Metalindo Menggunakan Metode House of Risk,” J. Teknol. Dan Manaj., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 75–84, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.31284/j.jtm.2022.v3i2.3092.
  9. I. Marodiyah and I. Sudarso, “Analisis Risiko Guna Peningkatan Kualitas Proses Pembangunan Gedung Bertingkat,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 49–60, 2020.
  10. M. B. Yahman, A. Profita, and H. D. Widada, “Analisis Risiko dan Penentuan Strategi Mitigasi pada Proses Produksi Beras,” Matrik, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 67, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.30587/matrik.v20i2.1112.
  11. A. R. Andriansyah and W. Sulistyowati, “Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Clarisa Menggunakan Metode Lean Six Sigma dan Metode FMECA (Failure Mode and Effect Criticality Analysis),” ProZima Product. Optim. Manuf. Syst. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–56, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.21070/prozima.v4i1.1272.
  12. P. Chang and Y.-L. He, “Study of Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis,” in 2016 International Conference on Applied Electronics (AE), Pilsen, Czech Republic: IEEE, Sep. 2016, pp. 93–96, doi: 10.1109/AE.2016.7577249.
  13. A. Rahman and F. Fahma, “Penggunaan Metode FMECA (Failure Modes Effects Criticality Analysis) dalam Identifikasi Titik Kritis di Industri Kemasan,” J. Teknol. Ind. Pertan., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 110–119, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.24961/j.tek.ind.pert.2021.31.1.110.
  14. W. N. Tanjung, S. A. Atikah, S. Hidayat, E. Ripmiatin, S. S. Asti, and R. S. Khodijah, “Risk Management Analysis Using FMECA and ANP Methods in the Supply Chain of Wooden Toy Industry,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 528, no. 1, pp. 1–8, May 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/528/1/012007.
  15. F. R. Supoyo and R. A. Darajatun, “Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas untuk Mengurangi Defect Parking Brake dengan Metode FMEA di PT XYZ,” J. Serambi Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 4438–4444, 2023.
  16. T. Zakaria and A. D. Juniarti, “Analisis Pengendalian Kualitas Cacat Dimensi pada Header Boiler Menggunakan Metode FMEA dan FTA,” J. InTent, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–36, 2023.
  17. B. Khrisdamara and D. Andesta, “Analisis Penyebab Kerusakan Head Truck-B44 Menggunakan Metode FMEA dan FTA (Studi Kasus: PT. Bima, Site Pelabuhan Berlian),” J. Serambi Eng., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 3303–3313, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.32672/jse.v7i3.4255.