Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 1 No 4 (2018): August
Financial Accounting

Comparison of the Accuracy of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Abitrage Pricing Theory (Apt) in Predicting LQ45 Stock Returns
Perbandingan Akurasi Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) dan Abitrage Pricing Theory (Apt) Dalam Memprediksi Return Saham LQ45


View Article
  • Alis Setya Wati,
  • Wiwit Hariyanto*
Alis Setya Wati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Wiwit Hariyanto
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v2i2.88
Published August 31, 2018
Keywords
  • Stock Return,
  • LQ45,
  • Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM),
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
How to Cite
Wati, A. S., & Hariyanto, W. (2018). Comparison of the Accuracy of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Abitrage Pricing Theory (Apt) in Predicting LQ45 Stock Returns. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 1(4), 10.21070/ijler.v2i2.88. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v2i2.88

Copyright (c) 2018 Alis Setya Wati, Wiwit Hariyanto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study aims to determine which method is more appropriate in predicting LQ45 stock returns (2015-2017 period). The accuracy of the CAPM method and the APT method is measured by Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). This research uses quantitative methods with purposive sampling tech- nique. The population used in this study were all company shares listed in the LQ45 Index and obtained 32 shares for the LQ45 Index which was used as the research sample. The accuracy of the CAPM and APT models is measured through MAD (Mean Absolute Deviation), while the independent sample t-test is used to compare the accuracy between the CAPM method and the APT method. The results showed that the CAPM method was more appropriate than the APT method in predicting LQ45 stock returns because the value of MADCAPM was smaller than the average MADAPT, namely MADCAPM (0.0004) < MADAPT 0.0113, and based on the results of different test independent sample t-test with SPSS H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, there is a difference in accuracy because the Sig value is smaller than the significance level (5%), namely Sig = 0,000 < 0.05.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Afrida. (2018). Perbandingan Keakuratan Metode CAPM dan APT Dalam Memprediksi Return Saham ISSI (Periode 2013-2016). Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 1-9.
  2. Andri. (2010). Perbandingan Keakuratan CAPM dan APT Dalam Memprediksi Return Saham (Periode 2006-2010). Jurnal Riset Manajemen Keuangan, 1-20.
  3. Brigham, D. d. (2004). Penggunaan APT untuk Menganalisis Return Saham Syariah. Ultima Management Vol. 9 No. 1.
  4. Darmadji, F. d. (2011). Pasar Modal di Indonesia Edisi ke 3. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  5. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan IBM SPSS 23 (Edisi 8). Semarang: BPFE Uni- versitas Diponegoro.
  6. Gusni, S. R. (2017). Penggunaan APT Untuk Menganalisis Return Saham Syariah. Ultima Management, 1-16.
  7. Jogianto. (2013). Teori Portofolio Dan Analisis Investasi. Edisi kedelapan. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakar- ta.
  8. Lemiyana. (2015). Analisis Model CAPM dan APT Dalam Memprediksi Tingkat Return Saham Syariah .
  9. I-Finance, 1-18.
  10. Lintner. (1955). The valution on of risk assets and the selection of risk investment in stock portofolios and capital budgets. Journal of Finance, 1-25.
  11. Maftuhah, H. (2014). Perbandingan Metode CAPM dan APT Dalam Menghitung Tingkat Retun Saham JII. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Islam, 1-14.
  12. Mankiw. (2007). Penggunaan APT untuk Menganalisis Return Saham Syariah. Ultima Management Vol. 9 No. 1.
  13. Markowitz, H. (1952). Foundation of Portofolio Theory. Journal of Finance , pp 466-477.
  14. Murni. (2016). Penggunaan APT untuk Menganalisis Return Saham Syariah. Ultima Management Vol. 9 No. 1.
  15. Muzdalifah, A. (2009). Analisis Expected Return CAPM dan APT Pada Industri Manufaktur. Jurnal Ekonomi, Vol.V.No.2 September.
  16. Nopirin. (2002). Mankiw. (2007). Penggunaan APT untuk Menganalisis Return Saham Syariah. Ultima
  17. Management Vol. 9 No. 1. Ultima Management Vol. 9 No. 1.
  18. Pearson, C. (2009). Jurnal Manajemen - Bahan Kuliah Manajemen. Jurnal Manajemen, http://jurnal- sdm.blogspot.com.
  19. Prasetyo, A. d. (2015). Perbandingan Keakuratan CAPM dan APT Dalam Memprediksi Retun Saham JII (Periode 2010-2014). Jurnal FEB UB, 1-19.
  20. P, T. W. (2017, 05 29). Mean Absolute Deviation Menggunakan Regresi Linear dan Regresi Linear Kuadratis. Artikel Teknik Peramalan, pp. 1-3.
  21. Ross, S. A. (1976). The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing. Journal of Economic Theory vol. 13. Rudianto, M. d. (2014). Penggunaan APT untuk Menganalisis Return Saham Syariah. Ultima Management Vol. 9 No. 1.
  22. Samsul. (2015). Pasar Modal dan Manajemen Portofolio. Surabaya: Erlangga.
  23. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk .
  24. Journal of Finance , 1-33.
  25. Sugiyono. (2015 ). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif. Bandung : Alfabeta. Tandelilin. (2001). Analisis Investasi dan Manajemen Fortofolio. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  26. Tandelilin. (2010). Portofolio dan Investasi: Teori dan Aplikasi Edisi ke-18. Yogyakarta: PT KANISIUS.
  27. Tony, M. d. (2007). Penggunaan APT untuk Menganalisis Return Saham Syariah. Ultima Management Vol. 9 No. 1.
  28. Yunita, P. A. (2017). Analisis Komparatif CAPM dengan APT Dalam Memprediksi Return dan Risiko Saham . Skripsi, 1 - 102.
  29. Weston.et.al. (1999). Manajemen Keuangan. Journal of Finance, 1-25.