Vol 7 (2020): May
Production Management

Factors Determining the Regional Industrial Development and Industrial Production Potential: The Case of Samarkand Region
Faktor Penentu Perkembangan Industri Daerah dan Potensi Produksi Industri: Kasus Wilayah Samarkand


Jasur Juraboevich Yakhshilikov
“Silk Road” International University of Tourism, Uzbekistan *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published May 14, 2020
Keywords
  • Industry,
  • potential,
  • empirical mode,
  • threshold values,
  • sustainability
How to Cite
Yakhshilikov, J. J. (2020). Factors Determining the Regional Industrial Development and Industrial Production Potential: The Case of Samarkand Region. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 7, 10.21070/ijler.2020.V7.478. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2020.V7.478

Abstract

This article discusses the industry sector as the main factor affecting the development of our economy. It is well known that the development of industries contributes to the development of other sectors of the economy. Factors affecting the potential of industrial production were studied and analyzed using some boundary values that represent the sustainable development of the industry in the Samarkand region. Investments play an important role in the sustainable development of industry in the region. The analysis of the linear correlation between investments in fixed assets and GDP, as well as the following empirical models between gross industrial output and its factors for the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Samarkand region are presented. Conclusions are based on models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Mamadjonov D. O’zbekiston Respublikasida sanoat tarmog’ini rivojlantirishning asosiy omillari. // “Biznes - Ekspert” iqtisodiy ilmiy-amaliy oylik nashr. 2018. №10. 3 - b. [in Uzbek]
  2. UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2016. The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Vienna, Austria. 2015. http://www. unido.org.
  3. Lall S., (2000). Technological Change and Industrialization in the Asian Newly Industrializing Economies: Achievements and Challenges. In: Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, eds. Kim, L. and Nelson R.R., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.;Szirmai, A., and Verspagen, B., (2011). Manufacturing and Economic Growth in Developing Countries, 1950-2005. UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 2011-069. Maastricht, The Netherlands: United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.; McMillan, M., and Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, Structural Change and Productivity Growth. In Making Globalization Socially Sustainable, eds. Bacchetta, M., and Jansen, M. Geneva: International Labour Office and World Trade Organization.; Szirmai, A., Naudé, W., and Alcorta, L., (2013).
  4. Lavopa A. and Szirmai A. (2012). Industrialization, Employment and Poverty, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 2012-081. Maastricht The Netherlands: United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
  5. UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2016. Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. Vienna, Austria. 2013. http://www. unido.org.
  6. “Naysionalnaya innovatsionnaya sistema Uzbekistana: otsenka potensiala i rezultativnosti”. Proekt PROON. - Т.: 2011. S. 86-100. [in Russian]
  7. Glazev S.Iý., Lokosov V.V. Otsenka predelno kriticheskih znachenıı pokazateleı sostoıanııa rossııskogo obestva i ih ıspolzovanıe v ýpravlenıı sotsıalno - ekonomıcheskım razvıtıem. Ekonomıcheskıe i sotsıalnye peremeny: fakty, tendentsıı, prognoz. 4 (22) 2012. S. 26, 31, 33, 36.; Lokosov V.V. Stabılnost obestva i sıstema predelno-kriticheskih pokazateleı ego razvitııa. Metodika i tehnika sotsiologicheskih issledovanii. // Naýka, 1998,№ 4. - С. 89. [in Russian]