Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 7 (2020): May
Human Resource Management

The Effect of Monopoly Power, Asymmetric Information, Transparency and Accountability Towards Intent to Adopt E-Procurement
Pengaruh Kekuatan Monopoli, Informasi Asimetris, Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Niat Mengadopsi E-Pengadaan


View Article
  • H Habiburrochman*,
  • Siti Fatimah
H Habiburrochman
Airlangga University, Indonesia *
Siti Fatimah
Airlangga University, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2020.V7.456
Published May 5, 2020
Keywords
  • E-Procurement,
  • Fraud,
  • Corruption,
  • Good Governance,
  • Information Asymmetric,
  • Monopoly Power,
  • Transparency,
  • Accountability
    • ...More
    Less
How to Cite
Habiburrochman, H., & Fatimah, S. (2020). The Effect of Monopoly Power, Asymmetric Information, Transparency and Accountability Towards Intent to Adopt E-Procurement. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 7, 10.21070/ijler.2020.V7.456. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2020.V7.456

Copyright (c) 2020 H Habiburrochman, Siti Fatimah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

One of the benefits of e-procurement implementation in reducing corruption in public procurement process, to create good governance. Factors that affect corruption in public procurement process are monopoly power, asymmetric information, and lack of transparency and accountability. This study aims to determine. This research is expected to provide an overview of the potential and benefit of e-procurement in reducing corruption, increasing awareness towards the risk of fraud in public procurement, and provide a contribution to create good governance. The object in this study is the state university in Surabaya. A questionnaire is used to collecting the data, with total respondents are 70 officials. The result from this study shows that independent variable such as monopoly power, information asymmetric, transparency, and accountability have a significant effect on the intention to adopt e-procurement. Support from officials has a significant impact on the adoption of e-procurement.

View Article

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Anshori, Muslich & Sri Iswati. 2009. Quantitative Research Methodology. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press
  2. Bungin, Burhan. 2014. Quantitative Research Methodology. The Second Edition. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media
  3. Ghozali, Priests & Hengky Latan. 2015. Partial This Squares Concept of techniques and applications using SmartPLS Program 3.0. The Second Edition. Semarang: Agency Publisher Dipenogoro University
  4. Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. 2014 Forensic Accounting & Auditing active investigative reporting,. The Second Edition. Jakarta: Salemba Four
  5. Amagoh, Francis. 2009. Information Asymmetry and The Contracting Out Process. The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 14 (2): 3
  6. Azmi, Khairul Saidah Abas & Alifah Aida Lope Abdul Rahman . 2015. E-Procurement: A Tool to mitigate Public Procurement Fraud in Malaysia?. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 13(2): 150-160
  7. Croom, Simon & Alistair Brandon Jones. 2007. Impact of E-Procurement: Experiences from Implementation in the UK Public Sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13 (4): 294-303
  8. Abdul Halim, and Syukriy Abdullah. 2006. The relationship and the problem of shipping agency in Local Government: a budget and Accounting Research opportunities. The Journal of Accounting Rule 2(1): 53-64
  9. Melissa Handika FD & Dwiyani Sudaryanti. 2017. The analysis that Infuenced Student Intentions Whistleblowing Action (Study On Accounting Students STIE ASIA Malang). Scientific Journal of Business and Economic, 11(2): 56-63
  10. Haque, Sirajul & Pairote Pathrannarakul. 2013. The Role of Technology in Enhancing Transparency and Accountability in Public Sector Organization of Pakistan. The International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies, 2(1): 20-24
  11. Iqbal, M Sohel & Jin Wan Seo Chairman. 2008. E-Governance as an Anti Corruption Tool: Korean Cases. The Korean Journal of Information Processing, 11(2): 51-78
  12. Kaihatu, Thomas S. 2006. Good Corporate Governance and its application in Indonesia. The Journal of management and entrepreneurship, 8(1): 1-9
  13. Mistry, Jamshed J & Abu Jalal. 2012. An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between E-Government and Corruption. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12(6): 145-176
  14. Neupane, Thapan, Jeffrey Soar, Kishor Vaidya. 2014a. An Empirical Evaluation of the Potential of Public E-Procurement to reduce corruption. The Australian Journal of Information Systems, 18(2): 21-44
  15. Pathak, Raghuvar Dutt, Gurmeet Singh, Rakesh Belwal & Rfi Smith. 2008. E-Governance, corruption and Public Service Delivery: A Comparative Study of Fiji and Ethiopia. The Journal of Administration and Governance, 3 (1): 65-79
  16. Singh, Jagdip & Deepak Sindersmukh. 2000. Agency and Trust Mechanism in consumer satisfaction and loyalty Judgments. The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1): 150-167
  17. Wathne, Kenneth H & Jan B. Heide 2000. Opportunism in Interfirm Participating: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions. The Journal of Marketing, 64(4): 36-51
  18. Wolfe, David T & R Hermanson Funds. 2004. The Fraud Diamond: Considering The Four Elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12): 38-42
  19. Balsevich, Anna, Pivovarova & Elena Svetlana Podkolzina. 2011. Information Transparency in Public Procurement: How it works in Russian Language for '. Economics Research Paper, No. WP BRP 01/EC/2011
  20. Bertot, John Paul T Jaeger & Justin M Grimes. 2010. Using ICTs to create a culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social us Media Openess and Anti-Corruption Tools for Socities. Government Information Quarterly , 27 (3): 264-271
  21. Boehm, Frederic, and Juanita Olaya. 2006. Corruption in Public Contracting Please note: The Role of Transparency in Bidding Process. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77(4): 431-452
  22. Einsenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assesment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74
  23. Kim, Seongcheol, Hyun Jeong Kim & Heejin Lee. 2009. An Institutional Analysis of an E-Government System for Anti Corruption: The Case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1): page 42-50
  24. Kolstad, Ivar & Arne Wiig. 2009. Transparency is the key to reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries. World Development, 37(3): 521-532
  25. Neupane, Thapan, Jeffrey Soar, Kishor Vaidya, & Jianming Yong. 2012. Role of Public E-Procurement Technology to Reduce Corruption in Government Procurement. The paper presented in the International Public Procurement Conference. Seattle
  26. Neupane, Thapan, Jeffrey Soar, Kishor Vaidya, & Jianming Yong. 2014b. Willingness to adopt E-Procurement to Reduce Corruption Results of the PLS Path modeling. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(4): 500-520
  27. This kind of Nunung Rahmah, & Ferikawita M Sembiring. 2014. A review of the theory of Shipping Agency: the asymmetry of information in the spider Management Practices. The paper presented in 'National seminar Economics and Business'. Bandung
  28. Singh, Mohini. 2009. Information and Communication Technology Programs in E-Government and E-Learning - Their Impact on rural and regional communities. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
  29. Soudry, Ohad. 2007. A Principal-Agent Analysis of Accountability in Public Procurement. The paper presented in the International Public Procurement Conference. Rome
  30. Filho, Jose Rodrigues & Flavio modeled lessons. 2012. Public E-Procurement Implementation: Insight from the Structuration Theory, (Online), (https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Public-E-procurement-Implementation-Insights-from-Filho-Perazzo/4a301b96fae3c0aef6e867590b4334fb4f82e19e, accessed 5 April 2017).
  31. ______. 2010. The Government Regulation Number 54 Year 2010 regarding the procurement of goods/services for Government. State Gazette of The Republic Of Indonesia in 2010. Jakarta: State Secretariat
  32. ______. 2012. The Government Regulation Number 70 of 2012 on the Second Amendment of the Presidential Regulation Number 54 Year 2010 regarding the procurement of goods/services for Government. The State Gazette OF The Republic Of Indonesia 2012. Jakarta: State Secretariat
  33. ______. 2015. Government Regulation Number 4 Year 2015 about the fourth changes over the Presidential Regulation Number 54 Year 2010 regarding the procurement of goods/services for Government. State Gazette of The Republic Of Indonesia 2015. Jakarta: State Secretariat