Login
Section Recent Cases

Legal Protection for Permanent Employees Against Termination of Employment at Outsourcing Companies (study of PHI decision No. 267/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst)

Kepastian Perlindungan Hukum atas PHK bagi Pekerja Tetap pada Perusahaan Outsourcing (studi putusan PHI No.267/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst)
Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): November:

Margaretha Putri Setiadi (1), Rasji Rasji (2)

(1) Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

Abstract:

General Background: Outsourcing has become a prevalent labor practice in Indonesia, yet its implementation often creates legal uncertainty for permanent workers, particularly during termination of employment (PHK). Specific Background: The Industrial Relations Court (PHI) Decision No. 267/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst highlights inconsistencies in applying normative protections for outsourced workers following unilateral termination by PT G4S Security Services. Knowledge Gap: Despite existing regulations and judicial guidelines such as SEMA No. 3/2015, limited studies examine the judicial deviation from these norms and its implications for legal certainty and substantive justice. Aims: This study analyzes judicial reasoning behind the non-application of SEMA No. 3/2015 and assesses its juridical consequences for worker protection in the outsourcing system. Results: Findings indicate that the judges prioritized substantive justice by granting full process wages and reinstatement, deviating from the six-month wage limit mandated by SEMA. Novelty: The study offers a comparative analysis between the PHI decision and Supreme Court Decision No. 393 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024, revealing structural inconsistency in enforcing legal certainty. Implications: These inconsistencies highlight the urgent need to harmonize judicial guidelines and strengthen regulatory protections to ensure fairness and clarity for outsourced workers.


Highlights:




  • Emphasizes the tension between substantive justice and legal certainty in PHK cases for outsourced permanent workers.




  • Highlights judicial deviation from SEMA No. 3/2015, especially regarding the six-month limit on process wages.




  • Shows the need to harmonize regulations and judicial guidelines to strengthen protection for outsourced workers.




Keywords: Legal Protection, Permanent Workers, Outsourcing, Termination of Employment, Legal Certainty

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana, 2021.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Government of Indonesia, 2003.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penetapan Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 Tentang Cipta Kerja Menjadi Undang-Undang. Jakarta, Indonesia: Government of Indonesia, 2023.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja, Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja. Jakarta, Indonesia: Government of Indonesia, 2021.

P. M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya, Indonesia: Bina Ilmu, 2019.

J. Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang, Indonesia: Bayumedia, 2020.

H. S. Salim and E. S. Nurbani, Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. Jakarta, Indonesia: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2022.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Pasal 3–4. Jakarta, Indonesia: Government of Indonesia, 2004.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, serta Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Pasal 37 Ayat (3). Jakarta, Indonesia: Government of Indonesia, 2021.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan, Pasal 1 Ayat (15). Jakarta, Indonesia: Government of Indonesia, 2003.

G. Radbruch, Rechtsphilosophie. Heidelberg, Germany: C. F. Müller Verlag, 2020.

O. Kahn-Freund, Labour and the Law. London, U.K.: Stevens & Sons, 2019.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2015 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Supreme Court of Indonesia, 2015.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 393 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024: Pertimbangan Hukum. Jakarta, Indonesia: Supreme Court of Indonesia, 2024.

P. M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penerapannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya, Indonesia: Bina Ilmu, 1987.