Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review
Vol 19 No 4 (2024): November
Human Resource Management

Revolutionizing Workplace Safety Through Innovative Ergonomic Solutions in Indonesia
Merevolusi Keselamatan di Tempat Kerja Melalui Solusi Ergonomis yang Inovatif di Indonesia


  • Natasya Kurniawan Putri,
  • Boy Isma Putra*
Natasya Kurniawan Putri
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Boy Isma Putra
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1165
Published October 1, 2024
Keywords
  • workplace safety,
  • ergonomic analysis,
  • employee health,
  • Macro Ergonomic Analysis and Design,
  • occupational safety
How to Cite
Putri, N. K., & Putra, B. I. (2024). Revolutionizing Workplace Safety Through Innovative Ergonomic Solutions in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(4), 10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1165. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v19i4.1165

Copyright (c) 2024 Natasya Kurniawan Putri, Boy Isma Putra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

General Background: Workplace accidents significantly impact employee health, productivity, and organizational efficiency, necessitating effective safety and health management strategies. Specific Background: The study investigates the use of the Macro Ergonomic Analysis and Design (MEAD) method at PT Esprobags to improve occupational health and safety measures. Knowledge Gap: PT Esprobags faces challenges in effectively addressing employee health concerns, especially regarding health insurance and workplace conditions, despite increasing demand for safety protocols. Aims: This research aims to identify key health and safety issues affecting employees, utilizing MEAD to analyze and design solutions that mitigate workplace accidents and improve overall employee well-being. Results: The findings indicate that inadequate health insurance and infrequent health checks, along with insufficient drinking water quality and room cleanliness, are primary concerns among employees. The analysis reveals that environmental factors significantly influence employee safety, health, and performance, contributing to a 60.7% variance in the work environment's impact on safety and performance. Novelty: This study introduces a structured ergonomic approach tailored to the unique needs of the manufacturing sector, emphasizing the importance of holistic workplace assessments. Implications: PT Esprobags' implementation of the MEAD methodology can improve employee satisfaction, productivity, and safety, contributing to a broader understanding of workplace ergonomics and occupational health.

Highlights:

  1. Health Concerns: Inadequate health insurance and checks impact employee well-being.
  2. Environmental Impact: Workplace conditions significantly affect safety and productivity.
  3. Implementation Benefits: MEAD enhances satisfaction and reduces workplace accidents.
 

Keywords: workplace safety, ergonomic analysis, employee health, Macro Ergonomic Analysis and Design, occupational safety

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. . S. Sudalma, “Komitmen Manajemen dalam Pencegahan Kecelakaan Kerja,” JURNAL KEDIKLATAN WIDYA PRAJA, vol. 1, no. 2, 2021.
  2. . P. O. Dangga dan L. A. R. Winanda, “KAJIAN FAKTOR–FAKTOR PENYEBAB KECELAKAAN KONSTRUKSI,” SONDIR, vol. 5, no. 1, hlm. 24 31, 2021.
  3. . D. N. Putri dan F. Lestari, “Analisis Penyebab Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Pekerja Di Proyek Konstruksi: Literature Review,” Prepotif: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, vol. 7, no. 1, hlm. 444–460, 2023.
  4. . S. R. T. Handari dan M. S. Qolbi, “Faktor-Faktor Kejadian Kecelakaan Kerja pada Pekerja Ketinggian di PT. X Tahun 2019,” Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, vol. 17, no. 1, hlm. 90–98, 2021.
  5. . Y. Natalia, P. A. T. Kawatu, dan A. J. M. Rattu, “Gambaran Pelaksanaan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (SMK3) Di PT. PLN (Persero) Unit Pelaksana Pelayanan Pelanggan (UP3) Tolitoli,” KESMAS, vol. 11, no. 5, 2022.
  6. . M. B. Kurnia, “Faktor–Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Penerapan Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Dan Kesehatan Kerja (Smk3) Pada Perusahaan Bidang Pekerjaan Konstruksi,” Jurnal Student Teknik Sipil, vol. 2, no. 2, hlm. 141–146, 2020.
  7. . D. E. Wibowo dan S. Sajiyo, “EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SMK3) AT PT. PELABUHAN,” Jurnal Ekonomi, vol. 12, no. 3, hlm. 1820 1828, 2023.
  8. . K. S. Alfidyani, D. Lestantyo, dan I. Wahyuni, “Hubungan pelatihan K3, penggunaan APD, pemasangan safety sign, dan penerapan sop dengan terjadinya risiko kecelakaan kerja (Studi pada industri garmen kota Semarang),” Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (Undip), vol. 8, no. 4, hlm. 478–483, 2020.
  9. . N. Wahyuni, B. Suyadi, dan W. Hartanto, “Pengaruh keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3) terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan pada PT. Kutai Timber Indonesia,” JURNAL PENDIDIKAN EKONOMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial, vol. 12, no. 1, hlm. 99–104, 2018.
  10. . F. Saputra dan M. R. Mahaputra, “Building Occupational Safety and Health (K3): Analysis of the Work Environment and Work Discipline,” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, vol. 2, no. 3, hlm. 105–114, 2022.
  11. . S. N. Faradillah dan F. Johnson, “Analisis Beban Kerja dengan Menggunakan Metode Macroergonomic Analysis and Design (MEAD) di PT. XYZ,” dalam Talenta Conference Series: Energy and Engineering (EE), 2023, hlm. 628–635.
  12. . A. H. Pradini, D. R. Lucitasari, dan G. M. Putro, “Perbaikan sistem kerja dengan pendekatan macroergonomic analysis and design (MEAD) untuk meningkatkan produktifitas pekerja (Studi kasus di UD Majid Jaya, Sarang, Rembang, Jawa Tengah),” Opsi, vol. 12, no. 1, hlm. 36–47, 2019.
  13. . F. P. Al Havish dan B. I. Putra, “Design of Work Systems in Air Cooler Production Using Work Load Analysis (WLA) and Macroergonomic Analysis and Design (MEAD) Methods at PT GIJ,” Procedia of Engineering and Life Science, vol. 2, no. 2, 2022. [14]
  14. . D. Firmansyah, “Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Umum dalam Metodologi Penelitian: Literature Review,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), vol. 1, no. 2, hlm. 85–114, 2022.
  15. . R. N. Hidayat, I. Sukarsih, dan G. Gunawan, “Penentuan Strategi Bersaing pada Dua Brand Smartphone Menggunakan Teori Permainan,” Bandung Conference Series: Mathematics, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan 2022, doi: 10.29313/bcsm.v2i1.1946.
  16. . V. H. Pranatawijaya, W. Widiatry, R. Priskila, dan P. B. A. A. Putra, “Penerapan skala Likert dan skala dikotomi pada kuesioner online,” Jurnal Sains Dan Informatika, vol. 5, no. 2, hlm. 128–137, 2019.
  17. . C. E. Marbun dan B. A. H. Siboro, “Perancangan meja dan kursi komputer sesuai dengan sistem smart class pada laboratorium desain produk dan inovasi Institut Teknologi Del,” Jurnal Teknik Industri, vol. 10, no. 3, hlm. 255–265, 2020.
  18. . L. Amanda, F. Yanuar, dan D. Devianto, “Uji validitas dan reliabilitas tingkat partisipasi politik masyarakat kota Padang,” Jurnal Matematika UNAND, vol. 8, no. 1, hlm. 179–188, 2019.